This is a Catch 22 every reader both longs for and fears – what happens if you read a book so wonderfully, thoroughly and genuinely good that you cannot wait to talk about it with, well, everyone – but it has so many delightful plot twists, turns, revelations and about-faces that you actually can’t talk about it in case you spoil it completely?
That’s where I am right now. How to review a book without ruining it? Or rather, how to describe all that’s good about it without – well, you know – actually telling you too much about what’s good about it? Let’s give it a whirl.
I picked this up expecting a standard thriller. However, all
the cover hyperbole proved to be right. This is a thoroughly post-modern novel,
playing affectionately with structure and reader expectations of genre. With
every twist, it constantly snaps the reader out of their armchair complacency
and instead actively engages them in interpreting and analysing the text. In
this excellent novel by Joel Drucker, the concept of how writers – and their readers-
create meaning is explored and exposed.
Our narrator, Marcus Goldman, has become wildly successful
for writing the very book you are reading – instantly making you question
exactly what we can accept as truth. Can we ever trust what is
written? Marcus is incredibly close to his mentor, old university professor and
legendary US author Harry Quebert, whose renown is based on a quasi-mythical
book he wrote in 1975. This is also the same year that local teenager, Nola
Kellergan, went missing. Her whereabouts remained a mystery - until the present day, when her body is discovered in
Quebert’s backyard, along with the manuscript copy of his famous work. Marcus
sets out to exonerate his old friend by discovering what truly happened that
summer.
Each chapter starts with a snippet of an ongoing dialogue
between Marcus and Quebert, who is imparting his wisdom through setting down
his rules for writing. Each serves to indicate the action, themes and irony
abounding in the continuance and changes of plot in each subsequent chapter,
serving as a meditation on the role of the writer in creating (and recreating) life.
It’s an obvious parallel to how we create meaning in our own lives; how our own
unique perspective weaves events and shapes the role of others into our own
story.
Characters intertwine and interact throughout the narrative
via an intricate patterning that fulfils different genre conventions, depending
on your (and the character’s) viewpoint. This serves to keep the reader
guessing, trying to apply and fix conventions to characters - one minute the
novel becomes a love story with intimate scenes and sentimental memories; the
next it’s a mystery novel with detectives, clues and car chases.It also
frequently leaps into an amused satire on the contemporary media and publishing
businesses, and how they serve to frame and present an ultimate “truth”, which
is actually a useful construct based on what will sell the most and what will titillate
the public. This is a fairly well-worn theme, particularly when used as a plot
device – but this is only a minor quibble, and certainly not one which will
spoil your enjoyment of the story.
Marcus himself is likeable, intelligent, dryly witty and
emotionally engaging. Reminiscent of F. Scott Fitzgerald’s Nick in the Great
Gatsby and Donna Tartt’s Richard in The Secret History, Marcus is a passionate advocate for truth and
justice, for the integrity of the written word, and you care because he does. This
is the heart of the novel which provides a staunch foundation on which it
performs its ever growing number of spectacles and shocks – and which provides
enough support to make it seamless.
Flashbacks, changing character perspectives, potential and
phantom endings all feature, providing a shifting, unreliable and changing
version of events. Numerous writings form a substantial part of the narrative–
including drafts, reports, novel extracts, letters and transcripts – adding a
veneer of authenticity and a strongly grounded sense of truth, somehow, to be
found within them. This layering of the narrative explores in the same way as
the plot how we create meaning and locate truth – how we shape our
understanding of history from sources, and how that history is constantly
reedited and transformed by each new discovery.
There are also some fantastic
twists and revelations, more than enough to please any fan of classic whodunits,
and despite the breathtakingly inventive approach to plotting – which could
have deterred from the sheer immersive joy of reading – the writing itself and
the flow of the story is flawless and smooth enough to capture your
imagination. This is a novel which captures its reader and refuses to
relinquish its grip, even beyond the last page.
In fact, the only problem with this novel is that once you
read it, you will urge everyone else you know to read it purely for the
pleasure of discussing it with them. Which, actually, is a rather pleasant
problem to have.
Follow us on Twitter -
@YC_Reading and tell us what you thought of “The Truth About The Harry Quebert
Affair.” Love it or loathe it, we’d love to hear about it.
Comments
Post a Comment